Hi all,
I've posted before on different topics. I wanted to give a quick update.
My wife is 36, she was diagnosed with AML - M5 in June 2008. She had an Allo transplant Oct 24, 2008, part of a study, purposefully mismatched 8/10 donor. No immuno drugs as part of the transplant, but she did take Prednizone for a mild GVHD skin rash for 3 months.
She started back to work part time in February 2009 and full time July 1, 2009. She has been amazing. She received her transplant at Siteman Cancer Center, in St. Louis, and her care has been great. Besides the minor skin rash, no real side effects.
She had her 1 year post transplant BMB two weeks ago and everything was clear. She'll get more details this coming Wednesday when she gets a few more vaccines, but the initial report was that the biopsy was clear of leukemia. Not a big surprise, her blood work has looked great and we knew her 6 month BMB looked good, but it is still comforting to know that the 1 year post transplant BMB looked good too.
Unfortunately, these boards are sometimes filled with set backs and sadness. I wanted to make sure to post some good news.
Happy November everyone.
Kevin in St. Louis
Fantastic, Kevin, great to hear! Interesting study, this mismatched 8/10 transplant. Wonderful that it's had such a good outcome! Do you know how any of the other folks in the study are doing?
I'm at almost 16 months, BMT instead of an SCT as part of a study. Her transplant study sounds way more fascinating, though, and it will be interesting to see what conclusions are drawn down the road.
Happy 1st re-birthday to her! And many more, of course!!
Pam
We love good news and you're right, this is amazing. They purposely mismatched her or there was no closer match than an 8/10?
And no immune suppression? That's new to me. Heck, I just had to go back on it after five years. Amazing she's had no significant GVH.
Congratulations and best wishes to both of you for continued success.
Blessings
Pam,
Thanks. I am pretty excited about how well she has been doing. The clinical trial she was in is Phase II, I think. It started at the University of Minnesota, but is now being tried at several facilities around the country in small numbers. I think our facility, Siteman Cancer Center in St. Louis, was going to try to enroll 15 patients for the study. I honestly forget a lot of the details. They looked for a specific mismatch at two places between patient and donor. The hope was the mistmatch would lessen the chances of GVHD and increase GVL. I think they removed the T Cells from the donor's stem cells. The theory being that T Cells may increase the risk of GVHD. (This I think is an area of controversy, and not everyone in the medical/research world agrees with the theory that T Cells cause increased risk of GVHD.) The other big thing, and something I think is really important, was no immuno suppresent drugs post transplant. On the boards I hear about people who are on immuno drugs for a year or more post transplant and how rough those drugs can be on the body. My wife did have to take 3 months of Prednizone post transplant to deal with a GVHD rash, but she did not take any of the normal immuno suppresent drugs.
I am hopeful that this study continues and researchers will be able to develop improved transplant protocols. I will note that a patient in the study in St. Louis did not do as well as my wife, I'm not sure how the study is doing as a whole.
I try to read everything I can on cancer research. It is an evil disease and the more researchers learn about it, the more questions are raised. While I hope there comes a time when research develops a treatment of cancer across the board, it seems like now doctors/researchers are working towards a patient specific treatment. Depending on the genetics, type of cancer, etc, what might work for one patient, might not work for the next, and doctors need to be able to be creative and flexible and think on their feet to craft specialized treatments for individual patients.
Kevin
Tex,
As part of the study they purposely mismatched her. But as it turns out, at the time of her transplant there were no 10/10 matches for her. Her three siblings were not a match. They then went to the donor banks and could not find a 10/10 match. We had been asking about any clinical trials she could participate in. Siteman Cancer in St. Louis is a National Cancer Institute and runs 200+ trials. They had just started taking patients for this particular study at the same time my wife needed a transplant. They found an 8/10 mismatch, with the mismatches in the right places, from a donor in the States, but he could never clear his physical. So they found a second 8/10 mismatch from a young woman somewhere in Europe. Pretty amazing.
As for them not using any immune suppression drugs. I think it was a two part kind of trial. Part one lets take the T cells out of the donor's stem cells, part two, lets not give my wife any immune suppression drugs...and lets see what happens. In my wife's case is working amazing well. I remember on the door to her hospital room they posted a big sign reminding the nurses that my wife was on a clinical trial and did not get two common immune suppression drugs. I'm sure if things had not worked out and GVHD had popped up, they would have put her on immune suppression drugs to deal with it.
I hope this clinical trial pans out and future transplant will be performed without the need to automaticly prescribe immune suppresion drugs post transplant.
Kevin
poskinmel....best of luck to you and your child with the upcoming transplant.
As far as I know it was a T Cell depleted transplant. I know there are other clinical trials looking into T Cell depleted tranplants. I'm not sure if this study was different in that no immune suppression drugs were used. I also remember the doctors telling us that this clinical trial used a "milder" or less harsh round of chemo and TBI before the transplant. At least less harsh than our cancer center would normally use with transplants. My wife had 2 rounds of TBI, and I think they usualy like to use usually like to go with 3 rounds. And I forget the exact chemo cocktale. I remember they used the ATG, made from rabbits.
I found a link to the study on the Siteman Cancer Center website for those interested in the details:
http://www.siteman.wustl.edu/ProtDetail.aspx?ProtID=4672
Hope this helps anyone interested.
Kevin
I think my wife was the second person enrolled in the study Siteman Cancer Center in St. Louis. We were told the first person relapsed quickly, unfortunately. I do not know any of the specifics on the first patient, like age, cytogentics, etc. The patient would have had AML, but I don't know any of the other details. I think a 3rd person has been enrolled, but I do not know the status of that person. I think they are having some trouble finding patients, because they need to be in remission and in need of a stem cell transplant, and then they need to find a donor with a specific mistmatch. The link I just posted states that the trial is running at 7 facilities and is looking for 100 patients.